Skip to main content

Permits and Real Due Diligence

One of the biggest traps of investing is the refrain "do your own due diligence" (DYODD). Frankly at its worst this can be a hollow and dangerous encouragement for inexperienced investors to take a cursory peak at the company's own propaganda -- news releases and investor presentations -- before plopping down good money on a bad speculation. Even worse is the false assurance that people can get by hearing it directly from the horse's mouth (talking to company management or its investor relations department).

Actual, real due diligence starts by reading the company's financial statements and other regulatory disclosures (insider trading reports, technical reports, etc.). This can be hard and time-consuming. It requires you to know how to interpret financial and technical information. Sometimes though real due diligence is easy enough that just about anybody can do it, if they simply knew how.

Since I'm a provocateur but also because I want to see markets be better informed and become more efficient, I've decided to start sharing some of the methods to conduct real due diligence in the mining industry. We'll start by discussing the public availability of permit information (mainly in the United States, sometimes in Canada and elsewhere as well).

The example I will use as a starting point is the U.S. Forest Service permit process. There are plenty of others we can discuss later, some of which I am currently using to help manage mining stock portfolio.

The website at https://www.fs.fed.us/ has some very useful information if you spend enough time to research it. I'm not going to simply just give you all the answers, however, as that won't help you learn how to search and find things like this on your own. Instead, I'll give the motivation by pointing out an actual situation where knowing permit status would be very useful to decide when to buy (or sell) a particular company.

The following 2 images will give you more than enough clues to complete this homework assignment. First, find the name of the company and second find exactly where on the U.S. Forest Service website you can find the file that reveals just how spectacularly wrong this company's management is about the permit timeline for its upcoming drill campaign. Please use the comment section for questions, solutions and discussion. There are a few nuances to this we should go over once you've finished the homework (including what "scoping" means, the public comment process, etc.) and we can do that in the comments section as well.

(from Corporate Presentation)

(from U.S. Forest Service)

Comments

  1. Based on the history of opposition to the neighboring Taylor mine (and it's subsequent sale), I don't know how Barksdale Capital (bro.v) thinks it will just breeze thru with no opposition from a strong local environmentalist opposition. The fact that Arizona Mining sold itself to South 32 Limited (deeper pockets) shows this. I'm slow (it's also late at night here) so I could not find where to navigate to on the forest service site. I googled the company and it's neighbor to get my info. Any advice on better navigation?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Start here: https://www.fs.usda.gov/coronado

      Delete
  2. maybe their mistake related to that 8/2020, while management expects drilling to begin in H2/2019?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You can look at the past history of getting projects approved at this ranger station, it's about a ~2 year process for an EA. The only hope to drill later this year is to downgrade the program to a few holes and attempt a CE (Categorical Exemption from environmental review). That's what the previous operators tried to do before throwing their hands up.

      Delete
  3. To their credit, the company has now aligned its timeline with the realities of U.S. Forest Service permitting in the Coronado National Forest. As per their May 2019 Corporate Presentation:

    2020
    • Initial drilling campaign at Sunnyside once permits
    are in place

    Will follow up with a post later.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Video Analysis of Vale Dam Collapse at Brumadinho

Below you will find annotated video analysis of the Vale Córrego do Feijão Dam I collapse at the iron ore mine near Brumadinho in Brazil. This is being done in an attempt to learn early lessons and identify takeaways. Close up in slow motion (0.50x and 0.25x speed) reveals initial slide movement, failure sequence and possible trigger. Movement is seen initially at a seepage point in the toe of the dam near a "groin" area (where a starter dyke reinforcement extends outward at the center of the dam .... left side in the video). The movement is possibly a gush of water being ejected at the seepage point due to a change in pore pressure indicating that mobilized shear stress had overcome shear resisting force and initiated sliding along a critical slip surface. Based on this and other indications, the collapse of the dam is possibly yet another case of static liquefaction triggered by progressive deformation and increase in pore pressure, not (necessarily) seismic activity o

Sun Metals Erroneously Posts a Draft News Release on 2019 Stardust Exploration

PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENT NOTE: The below is only for historical purposes, the information is NOT actual disclosure or dissemination. The news release described in this post has been issued by the company this morning: https://sunmetals.ca/news/2020/sun-metals-extends-plunge-length-of-high-grade-copper-gold-massive-sulphide-discovery-to-325-metres-in-421-zone/ * * * I'm not going to go into all the details here and now, this is just for posting the draft PDF news release that Sun Metals erroneously(?) put on its website early on Friday, January 17, 2020. You don't see this type of situation often where the IIROC regulation on fair dissemination of material information  has been so thoroughly violated (by accident or otherwise). The scenario means that a number of investors who went to the Sun Metals website and noticed the news posting were able to buy (doubtful) and sell (for sure) during market hours using the inadequately-disseminated material information discl